Introduction: Progress in formal commonsense reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
This special issue consists largely of expanded and revised versions of selected papers of the Fifth International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Common Sense 2001), held at New York University in May 2001.1,2 The Common Sense Symposia, first organized in 1991 by John McCarthy and held roughly biannually since, are dedicated to exploring the development of formal commonsense theories using mathematical logic. Commonsense reasoning is a central part of human behavior; no real intelligence is possible without it. Thus, the development of systems that exhibit commonsense behavior is a central goal of Artificial Intelligence. It has proven to be more difficult to create systems that are capable of commonsense reasoning than systems that can solve “hard” reasoning problems. There are chess-playing programs that beat champions [5] and expert systems that assist in clinical diagnosis [32], but no programs that reason about how far one must bend over to put on one’s socks. Part of the difficulty is the all-encompassing aspect of commonsense reasoning: any problem one looks at touches on many different types of knowledge. Moreover, in contrast to expert knowledge which is usually explicit, most commonsense knowledge is implicit. One of the prerequisites to developing commonsense reasoning systems is making this knowledge explicit. John McCarthy [25] first noted this need and suggested using formal logic to encode commonsense knowledge and reasoning. In the ensuing decades, there has been much research on the representation of knowledge in formal logic and on inference algorithms to
منابع مشابه
Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis
In a speech community, people utilize their communicative competence which they have acquired from their society as part of their distinctive sociolinguistic identity. They negotiate and share meanings, because they have commonsense knowledge about the world, and have universal practical reasoning. Their commonsense knowledge is embodied in their language. Thus, not only does social life depend...
متن کاملCoverage and Competency in Formal Theories: A Commonsense Theory of Memory
The utility of formal theories of commonsense reasoning will depend both on their competency in solving problems and on their conceptual coverage. We argue that the problems of coverage and competency can be decoupled and solved with different methods for a given commonsense domain. We describe a methodology for identifying the coverage requirements of theories through the large-scale analysis ...
متن کاملClassification Reasoning as a Model of Human Commonsense Reasoning
In this article, it is proposed to consider classification reasoning based on inducing and using implicative dependencies as a model of commonsense reasoning. The main concept of this reasoning is a good classification test considered as a formal concept of the FCA. The Galois lattice is used for constructing good classification tests. Special rules are determined for constructing Galois lattic...
متن کاملReasoning with Dynamic Domains and Computer Security
Representing objects in a dynamic domain is essential in commonsense reasoning under some circumstances. Classical logics and their nonmonotonic consequences, however, are usually not able to deal with reasoning with dynamic domains due to the fact that every constant in the logical language denotes some existing object in the static domain. In this paper, we explore a logical formalization whi...
متن کاملLogic for a Lifetime Logic for a Lifetime
There has been an explosion of formal work in commonsense reasoning in the past fteen years, but almost no signiicant connection with work in building commonsense reasoning systems (cognitive or otherwise). We explore the reasons, and especially the ideal formal assumption of omniscience, reviewing and extending arguments that this is irreparably out of line with the needs of any real reasoning...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Artif. Intell.
دوره 153 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004